The arguments hinged on a procedural question about the powers of lower courts that conservatives appeared sympathetic to, but that could create a patchwork of citizenship across the country.

Will the Supreme Court stop radicals in robes from subverting the president and imperiling the separation of powers via rule by universal injunction?

Several justices expressed skepticism about the legality of President Trump’s proclamation. No justice expressed clear ...

Maggie Haberman said the courts are the "last vestige" against Trump's onslaught on "every" American system he can "attack," ...

The justices should affirm that there's only one court meant to make nationwide injunctions, on birthright citizenship or ...

Supreme Court hears birthright citizenship case, WNBA season opens and more in today’s edition of The Yodel newsletter ...

President Trump in an overnight social media post targeted “sleazebag” Democrats whom he accused of “playing the ref” with ...

Blank Rome attorneys Massimo D’Angelo and William Pekarsky analyze the underlying government incentives which have largely ...

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday heard arguments over whether district judges can issue nationwide injunctions against President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship. Based on ...

The justices heard arguments in Trump’s emergency appeals over lower court orders that have kept the restrictions on hold ...

In the trade war, China “adopted Mr Trump’s own tactic of maximum pressure”, responding to America’s extreme tariffs in kind, ...

The Supreme Court will likely rule in a month or two. If the justices decide against Trump, the injunction on his birthright ...