Trump has recently announced preliminary trade deals with Japan and other countries, and many of his paused “reciprocal” ...

Wall Street analysts are betting hard against Trump’s trade agenda surviving in court. The lawsuits stacking up across the ...

President Donald Trump said late Tuesday he struck a “massive” trade deal with Japan, lowering his threatened tariffs on ...

The investment bank thinks a 9-0 ruling against Trump is likely. That doesn't mean the tariffs will just go away.

The Cato Institute and the New Civil Liberties Alliance urge the Federal Circuit to extend the logic of a decision against Trump's import taxes.

A three-judge panel of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) issued a landmark decision on May 28, 2025, in V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. United States, concluding that tariffs ...

On May 28, 2025, the United States’ Court of International Trade (CIT) struck down the President’s use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs.[1] This ...

As a federal court, its authority originates from Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in ...

Trade sanctions on Cuba of various sorts have existed since the 1959 Cuban Revolution; nevertheless, the United States has failed to dislodge the regime of Fidel Castro and his successors from power.

The court’s jurisdiction extends to any civil action brought against the United States, its officers, or agencies involving international trade law.[4] This broad mandate includes cases arising ...

Defending the Court of International Trade Ruling Against Trump's Tariffs - A Reply to John Yoo ... He cites United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936) to support that position.