A new study of 12,750 arXiv papers finds about a third of recent submissions read as AI-written, raising questions about ...
The Chosun Ilbo on MSN
ArXiv imposes one-year ban for AI-generated paper violations
The world’s largest preprint repository, arXiv, has introduced a “one-strike” sanction banning submissions for one year for low-quality papers indiscriminately mass-produced using artificial ...
ArXiv, a widely used open repository for preprint research, is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers. Although papers are posted to the site before ...
ArXiv.org, one of the world’s most popular repositories of free scientific research, is cracking down on AI-generated content and those who fail to copyedit for hallucinations before submission. "[If] ...
AI-generated slop has shown up everywhere, including in the peer-reviewed literature. Fake citations, unedited prompt responses, and nonsensical diagrams have all slipped past editors and peer ...
Fifty-four seconds. That’s how long it took Raphael Wimmer to write up an experiment that he did not actually perform, using a new artificial-intelligence tool called Prism, released by OpenAI last ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results